Which of the following statements does not describe an effect of Indian removal on the Osage? A. The Osage were forced to leave homelands in the Southeast and move to the Indian Territory
B. Treaties caused the Osage to cede most of their land in Arkansas and Missouri,
C. Wars broke out between the Osage and tribes that were brought to the Indian Territory
D. The Osage eventually were removed from the Indian Territory and taken to Kansas,

A.

Explanation:

Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.

It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.

The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma. This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans.

Thus the correct option is A.

1) the taiping rebellion was prompted from 1850-1864 and waged against the ruling of machu qing dynasty. the rebellion was caused by hong xiuquan and class differences, later leading to a radical change in social and economic structure.

3) karl marx, a believer of the principle of socialism, believed that the working class would have to free themselves from the exploitation of industrialists by establishing a radical socialist classless society where all industries and   property are owned by the state.

5) as indians revolt gained power, people found additional reasons to protest against the british rule. princely families joined the uprising due to changes to the inheritance law which made adopted children ineligible to assume the throne. this was an attempt by the british to control royal succession in the princely states that were nominally independent from the british.

d) he bring down boss tweed and tammany hall.